Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 La. 883 - Miller v. Miller

Miller v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 1995
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1995

10 state decisions

6019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelly v. Kelly · Succession of Curtis · Fleitas v. Richardson · Harman v. Defatta · Hewitt v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. When one of the spouses makes a transfer of property to the other, who is judicially separated from him or her, in payment of his or her rights. “2. When the transfer made by the husband to his wife, even though not separated, has a legitimate cause, as the replacing of her dotal or other effects alienated. “3. When the wife makes a transfer of property to her husband, in payment of a sum promised to him as a dowry.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Upon examination of the instrument of August 21, 1942, we find that it was a prohibited contract on its face at the time it was executed. If it was a prohibited contract at the time it was executed, no action or inaction on the part of the parties could afterwards render it valid. La.C.C. art. 2030 provides: A contract is absolutely null when it violates a rule of public order, as when the object of a contract is null or immoral. A contract that is absolutely null may not be confirmed. Absolute nullities may be invoked by any person or may be declared by the court on its own initiative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Art. 2656. Delivery essential to a giving in payment “Art. 2656. That giving in payment differs from the ordinary contract of sale in this, that the latter is perfect by the mere consent of the parties, even before the delivery, while the giving ini payment is made only by delivery.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.