Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

234 Md. 337

Faraclas v. Faraclas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1964

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1964-04-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1967

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-04-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER Curiam,

¶1The appellant, a husband who seeks to avoid the stigma of having been judicially declared to have been an adulterer, and the necessity of continuing to support his wife, bases his claim to a reversal on a printed record extract of some four hundred forty pages of testimony and exhibits. Our examination of the extract and our consideration of the earnest and detailed arguments of counsel for the appellant, both printed and forensic, leaves us convinced that the persuasion of the trial judge, after a fourteen-day trial, that the husband and his paramour had both the inclination to commit adultery and ample opportunity to indulge that inclination and had done so, had a sufficient probative basis.

¶2Decree affirmed, with costs.

/234/md/337 · .json · Public domain