Twining v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably 64 Cal. 2d 647 - Huntingdon v. Crowley (1966), 164 Md. App. 95 - Marquardt v. State (2005)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Giles v. State · Bruce v. State · Hickory Transfer Co. v. Nezbed · Proctor Electric Co. v. Zink · Grogg v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is generally recognized that it is inappropriate to instruct on the law at this stage of the case, or to question the jury as to whether or not they would be disposed to follow or apply stated rules of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“would give the accused the benefit of the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.