Johnson v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1984
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barrett v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. · Plotkin v. Northland Transportation Co. · Mahutga v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. · St. Paul Motor Vehicle Co. v. Johnston · State v. Dimler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * Any speeds in excess of such limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that any speed limit within any municipality shall be an absolute speed limit and any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Butler v. Engel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.