Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

234 N.C. 392

67 S.E.2d 282

Docket No. 75.

State v. Brock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1951.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1951-10-31

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1957

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. . Dove · State v. . Guice

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1951-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Harry McMullan, Atty. Gen., Ralph Moody, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles G. Powell, Jr., Member of Staff, Raleigh, for the State.

¶2Robert S. Cahoon, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant, appellant.

¶3DEVIN, Chief Justice.

¶4This court is of the opinion unanimously that defendant's plea of former jeopardy was properly denied. State v. Dove, 222 N.C. 162, 22 S.E.2d 231; State v. Guice, 201 N.C. 761, 161 S.E. 533. But the members of the court are evenly divided in opinion (Justice VALENTINE not sitting) whether error in the admission of *283 testimony as to declarations and conduct of Jim Cook in the absence of the defendant was prejudicial requiring a new trial. Hence the judgment of the Superior Court must stand affirmed, without becoming a precedent.

¶5Judgment affirmed.

¶6VALENTINE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

¶7BARNHILL and JOHNSON, JJ., dissent for the reason they are of the opinion the defendant is entitled to a new trial for error in the admission of evidence of conduct and declarations of Jim Cook.

/234/nc/392 · .json · Public domain