234 N.C. App. 445 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Turner · 148 N.C. App. 135 - State v. Logner · Wiggs v. Edgecombe County · 160 N.C. App. 107 - State v. Smith · 17 N.C. App. 279 - State v. Shadding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f a subsequent chemical analysis is requested pursuant to this subsection, the person shall again be advised of the implied consent rights in accordance with G.S. 20-16.2(a).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the State was required, pursuant to the mandates of [N.C. Gen. Stat.] § 20-16.2(a) and as reiterated by [N.C. Gen. Stat.] § 20-139.1(b5), to re-advise [the] defendant of his implied consent rights before requesting he take a blood test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. St. John v. Thomas“[a]ny law enforcement officer who has reasonable grounds to believe that the person charged has committed the implied-consent offense may obtain a chemical analysis of the person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. St. John v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.