Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 N.W.2d 621 - Piper v. Piper

Piper v. Piper’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2017

12 state decisions

5019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grant v. Grant · Atwood v. Atwood · 182 So. 2d 1 - Brackin v. Brackin · Dahl v. Dahl · Montgomery v. Montgomery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is both practical and just that if one jointly or individually possesses an asset during the pendency of a divorce action and is subsequently awarded that asset by the divorce judgment, he should not have to divest himself of that asset before appealing the judgment. This is most obvious when the asset is a necessity of life.” Piper v. Piper, 234 N.W.2d at 623 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where the reversal of the judgment cannot possibly affect the appellant’s right to the benefit he has secured under the judgment, then an appeal may be taken, and will be sustained, despite the fact that the appellant has sought and secured such benefit.” 4 N.D. at 381 , 61 N.W. at 469 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““If a provision of the judgment appears to have been fixed by consent, or is undisputed, or, for any reason, cannot be changed or reversed by the appeal, an acceptance of the benefit given by such provision is not a waiver of the appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.