Waples v. Yi’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Etheridge v. Medical Center Hospitals · 125 Wash. 2d 129 - Carrick v. Locke · 117 Wash. 2d 772 - John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood Center · Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49 · Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`if they cannot be harmonized, the court rule will prevail in procedural matters and the statute will prevail in substantive matters.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.