State v. Bashaw’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
37 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neder v. United States · Arizona v. Washington · 126 Wash. 2d 244 - State v. Powell · 147 Wash. 2d 330 - State v. Brown · State v. Kirkman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause this is a criminal case, all twelve of you must agree in order to answer the special verdict form,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bea · State v. Nunez“[W]hen unanimity is required, jurors with reservations might not hold to their positions or may not raise additional questions that would lead to a different result. We cannot say with any confidence what might have occurred had the jury been properly instructed. We therefore cannot conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury instruction error was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Retrial of a defendant implicates core concerns of judicial economy and finality. Where, as here, a defendant is already subject to a penalty for the underlying substantive offense, the prospect of an additional penalty is strongly outweighed by the countervailing policies of judicial economy and finality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.