Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

234 Pa. Super. 67

Commonwealth v. DeSantis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1975

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1975-03-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1989

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-03-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Opinion

Per Curiam,

¶2This is an appeal from the dismissal of appellant’s petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA).1 The only issue raised concerns the validity of *68the search warrant under which evidence used against appellant was seized. This issue was raised in post-trial motions, and was decided against appellant. There was no direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, although appellant concedes that he was advised not only of his right to appeal, but that he should appeal. This informed failure to appeal an issue decided below renders the claim raised here “finally litigated,” PCHA §4 (a) (1), 19 P.S. §1180-4 (a) (1), and appellant is not eligible for relief under the Act. PCHA §3(d), 19 P.S. §1180-8 (d).

¶3Order affirmed.

¶4. Act of Jan. 25, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1580, §§1 et seq., 19 P.S. §§1180-1 et seq. (Supp. 1974-75).

/234/pasuper/67 · .json · Public domain