Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 SO2D 350 - Simpson v. Merrill

Simpson v. Merrill’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
3
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably 422 So. 2d 838 - Berek v. Metropolitan Dade County (1982), 260 So. 2d 492 - Roberts v. Askew (1972)

34 state decisions

17019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 101 So. 2d 371 - Corneal v. State Plant Board · 171 So. 2d 526 - Palethorpe v. Thomson · 220 So. 2d 33 - Merrill v. Simpson · Miami Retreat Foundation v. Ervin · Green v. Schuler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We are aware of decisions holding the State and its agencies immune from taxation of costs of litigation. We are also aware that governmental agencies today directly effect the lives and property of private citizens more than at any time in the past. This trend has given rise to increased litigation as individuals contest the demands of government. When, through litigation, these demands are determined to be unlawful, the government, like any other party, should be compelled to pay the costs of the litigation. "To require successful litigants against the State and its agencies to pay their own costs offends our basic sense of fairness and may well be a violation of due process of law."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"... Florida Statutes § 57.041 F.S.A. provides for the recovery of legal costs by the party recovering the judgment in all cases except those specifically exempted. The exemptions in the statutes do not include the State or its agencies and we can find no basis for reading such an exemption into the plain language of the Act."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"The party recovering judgment shall recover all his legal costs and charges which shall be included in the judgment; but this section does not apply to executors or administrators in actions when they are not liable for costs."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.