Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

234 S.W.3d 432

State v. Nash

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-06-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2011

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Brooks

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-06-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Julius Nash (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of forcible rape, two counts of forcible sodomy and one count of kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that a reasonable juror could have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Brooks, 158 S.W.3d 841, 847 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

/234/sw3d/432 · .json · Public domain