Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 U.S. 36 - United States of America v. Rudolph Axman

United States of America v. Rudolph Axman’s Empirical Analysis

234 U.S. 36 · 1914

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2014 · most notably United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1915), Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United States (1945)

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

18019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Axman (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Prairie State Nat Bank of Chicago v. United States · Reese v. United States · United States v. Freel · United States v. John McMullen · United States v. Robeson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “cannot be used for the measure of recovery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e think the change in the place of dumping the spoil was very material, and could not be made consistently with the terms of the agreement under which Axman undertook to perform the work or be liable ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Dredging the channel would not be enough to show performance of his contract, unless [Axman] complied with the other material requirement as to the deposit of the spoil.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.