Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 U.S. 422 - Johnson v. Edwin Gearlds L J E

Johnson v. Edwin Gearlds L J E’s Empirical Analysis

234 U.S. 422 · 1914

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1999 · most notably United States v. Mazurie (1975), Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. (1919)

21 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions

220191419201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Donnelly v. United States · Tiger v. Western Investment Co. · United States v. Felipe Sandoval · United States v. Fisher · John Pollard et al. v. John Hagan et al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The laws which have'been or may be enacted by Congress, regulating trade and intercourse with the Indian tribes, to continuo and be in force within and upon the several reservations provided for heroin; and those portions of said laws which prohibit the introduction, manufacture, use of, and traffic in, ardent spirits, wines, or other liquors, in the Indian country, shall continue and be in force, within the entire boundaries of the coiintry herein ceded to the United States, until otherwise provided by Congress.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.