Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 Va. 646 - Leake v. Casati

Leake v. Casati’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2004

12 state decisions

70198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porter v. Warner Holding Co. · Croston v. Male · Cauthorn v. Cauthorn · Sensabaugh v. Sensabaugh · Leonard v. Boswell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The county states a non-sequitur. Even though the court’s power to order a division of land is unaffected by a subdivision ordinance, it does not follow that those who become owners of the resulting parcels will be immune to valid laws regulating land use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.