Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 ARIZ 405 - Weitz Co. v. Heth

Weitz Co. v. Heth’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Munsey Trust Co. · Andrews v. Blake · Mosher v. Conway · 2 Ariz. App. 321 - Peterman-Donnelly Engineers & Contractors Corp. v. First National Bank · Lamb Excavation, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where subrogation to a mortgage is sought, the entire obligation secured by the mortgage must be discharged. Partial subrogation to a mortgage is not permitted. The reason is that partial subrogation would have the effect of dividing the security between the original obligee and the subrogee, imposing unexpected burdens and potential complexities of division of the security and marshaling upon the original mortgagee. However, if the payor can negotiate a full settlement of the obligation for less than its face value, subrogation will be recognized,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.