State v. Gill’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wagstaff · State v. Berger · NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma County · State v. Casey · State v. Hinden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] “structure” for these purposes must satisfy three requirements: the structure must be (1) “any vending machine or any building, object, vehicle, railroad car or place with sides and a floor” that is (2) “separately securable from any other structure attached to it” and (3) “used for lodging, business, transportation, recreation or storage.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.