Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 ARK 345 - Cunningham v. Stockton

Cunningham v. Stockton’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fones Hardware Co. v. Erb · McLellan v. Pledger, County Treasurer · Bowman v. Frith · Sadler v. Craven

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any citizen of any county, city or town may institute suit in behalf of himself and all others interested, to protect the inhabitants thereof against the enforcement of any illegal exactions whatever.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.