Ozment v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hill v. Wilson · Dean v. Brown · Melton v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. · Wright v. Ford · Ward v. Magness
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e have repeatedly held that an adoption order is void if it fails to recite such essential jurisdictional facts. Dean v. Brown, 216 Ark. 761 , 227 S.W.2d 623 (1950).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.