In Re Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2017
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Nobelman v. American Savings Bank · INWOOD NORTH HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N v. Harris · Lam v. Investors Thrift (In Re Lam) · First Union Mortgage Corp. v. Eubanks (In Re Eubanks) · Kennard v. MBank Waco, N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The very essence of a § 1325(a)(5) modification is the write down or 'cramdown' of a secured claim to the value of the collateral securing the debt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the 'last' payment due under the original schedule in § 1322(c)(2) refers to the 'final' payment and not the most recent payment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A restrictive covenant that touches and concerns the land is binding on subsequent purchasers of the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.