235 Cal. App. 2d 228 - Stephan v. Proctor’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 9 Cal. 2d 279 - McCann v. Hoffman · 110 Cal. App. 81 - Crawford v. Foster · Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co. · 19 Cal. 2d 428 - Whitechat v. Guyette · 49 Cal. 2d 359 - Gillespie v. Rawlings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“He further testified that it was true that the words he used were that he wanted her to help move Carson; that he did not tell her he did not intend her to help; and that he would have gone by himself if she had not accompanied him. Further evidence reflects that respondent and Collasto were sharing expenses and that it was anticipated that Carson on moving in would contribute his share. There is nothing to show that this information was communicated to appellant. [1] Generally it is for the trier of fact to determine whether or not a person riding in another car is a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“person who as a guest accepts a ride ... without giving compensation for such ride.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.