Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 CALAPP3D 1157 - People v. Johnson

People v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · 66 Cal. 2d 508 - People v. Pennington · 67 Cal. 2d 272 - People v. Laudermilk · People v. Merkouris · 45 Cal. 3d 1335 - People v. Marks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At no time in these proceedings did the trial court ever express doubt about defendant's competency; nor was there any evidence presented that defendant was incompetent. Thus the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendant's motion to withdraw her request for a competency hearing. [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “consistently declined to set a formal hearing on competency until further evidence was presented....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.