L.G. v. M.B.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 50 Cal. 3d 205 - Silberg v. Anderson · 19 Cal. 4th 1106 - Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity · 29 Cal. 4th 69 - City of Cotati v. Cashman · 47 Cal. 3d 863 - Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker · California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our Supreme Court has explained that the interim adverse judgment rule is not part of the doctrine of res judicata or any of its branches, but is derived from the definition of probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]o justify departing from a literal reading of a clearly worded statute, the results produced must be so unreasonable the Legislature could not have intended them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not operate, like collateral estoppel, to preclude relitigation of an issue of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.