Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 CALRPTR3D 756 - People v. Yates

People v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 43 Cal. 3d 171 - People v. Ledesma · 22 Cal. 4th 690 - People v. Waidla · 19 Cal. 4th 1138 - Hubbart v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Documents like reports, criminal records, hospital records, and memoranda-prepared outside the courtroom and offered for the truth of the information they contain-are usually themselves hearsay and may contain multiple levels of hearsay, each of which is inadmissible unless covered by an exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.