Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 CONN 802 - State v. Esposito

State v. Esposito’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Connecticut v. Porter (1997), State v. Correa (1997)

66 state decisions

3101996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Kyles v. Whitley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well established that impeachment evidence may be crucial to a defense, especially when the state's case hinges entirely upon the credibility of certain key witnesses. ... The rule laid out in [ Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) ] requiring disclosure of exculpatory evidence applies to materials that might well alter ... the credibility of a crucial prosecution witness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “repeatedly held that neither the results of a polygraph test nor the willingness of a witness to take such a test is admissible in Connecticut Courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he Constitution is not violated every time the government fails or chooses not to disclose evidence that might prove helpful to the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.