No 11611’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2003
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger · Enelow v. New York Life Insurance · Shanferoke Coal Supply Corporation v. Westchester Service Corporation · United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America v. Miller Metal Products, Inc. · International Union United Furniture Workers of America v. Colonial Hardwood Flooring Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Faced with plaintiff’s suit for injunction and damages, the unions sought a stay order pursuant to § 3 of the Arbitration Act [ 9 U.S.C.A. § 3 ]. However, their position at that time was untenable. First, there was then no longer any issue referable to arbitration under the agreement in reference to arbitration. Even if the unions originally had an issue referable to arbitration, they chose instead to resolve that issue in their favor by use of their economic strength. Having thus violated their contract to plaintiff’s damage, it was too late for them to demand arbitration on that issue. Secondly, before the court could be justified in granting the stay order, it was necessary that the unions show that they were not in default with proceeding with such arbitration. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““If any suit or proceeding be brought in any of the courts of the United States upon any issue referable to arbitration under an agreement in writing for such arbitration, the court in which such suit is pending, upon being satisfied that the issue involved in such suit or proceeding is referable to arbitration under such an agreement, shall on application of one of the parties stay the trial of the action until such arbitration has been had in accordance with the terms of the agreement, providing the applicant for the stay is not in default in proceeding with such arbitration.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.