Burton S. Knapp v. John P. Kinsey’s Empirical Analysis
235 F.2d 129 · 1956
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1986
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burton S. Knapp v. John P. Kinsey · Blacklock v. Small · Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Circuit Management Corp. · Bosworth v. Terminal R Ass'n of St Louis · The Chickie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In our opinion, Section 144, Title 28, U.S.Code was not applicable to this case in which the claimed bias or prejudice was first disclosed during the trial. Under the circumstances the remedy can not be by a change of judges during the trial; it necessarily becomes a matter of alleged prejudicial error and for correction by the • Court of Appeals. Moskun v. United States, 6 Cir., 143 F.2d 129 ; United States v. Flegen-heimer, D.C.N.J., 14 F.Supp. 584, 591 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.