Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

235 F.2d 514

Docket No. 12951.

Davis v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 30, 1956.

Decided May 10, 1956.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-05-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1956

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-05-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*515Mr. Saul G. Lichtenberg, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Mr. Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Mr. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Messrs. Lewis Carroll and Harold H. Titus, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Mr. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty. at the time the record was filed, also entered an appearance for appellee.

¶4Before PRETTYMAN, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for the theft of a wallet from a customer in a market. His principal contention is that there was not sufficient evidence to go to the jury. We think there was. We find no error affecting substantial rights of the defendant.

¶7Affirmed.

/235/f2d/514 · .json · Public domain