Rupp v. Teets’s Empirical Analysis
235 F.2d 674 · 1956
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1967
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Frank v. Mangum · Gryger v. Burke · People v. Wells · George Collins v. James a Johnston · People v. Lindley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We cannot treat a mere error of state law, if one occurred, as a denial of due process; otherwise, every erroneous decision by a state court on state law would come here as a federal constitutional question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hughes v. Heinze
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.