Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 F.2d 821 - Flaxer v. United States

Flaxer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

235 F.2d 821 · 1956

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 1975
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1975

9 federal appellate ·

100195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia District Court)

Relationships

Applies 2 U.S.C. § 192 · 50 U.S.C. § 781

Relies on Galvan v. Press · Quinn v. United States · Barsky v. United States · Estate of Nathan v. Commissioner · Bart v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant was entitled, and in effect asked, to have his objection to the subpoena considered by ‘this committee’, i. e. the subcommittee. It was not so considered. Under Senate rules, the chairman was a quorum ‘for the purpose of administering oaths and taking sworn testimony’, but he was not a quorum for other purposes.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.