Andrew Mark Hudson v. J. R. Hunt North Carolina’s Empirical Analysis
235 F.3d 892 · 2000
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2021
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Coleman v. Thompson · Harris v. Reed · Evitts v. Lucey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and trial counsel merely informed defendant that they did not do appellate work and would not appeal his case, and counsel did not discuss the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the claim was not adjudicated on the merits, our review is de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Walker v. True
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.