Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

235 F. App'x 113

United States v. Nelson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2007

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-08-02

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2007-08-02

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Damien Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nelson, No. 3:95-cr-00051-nkm (W.D.Va. May 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/235/fappx/113 · .json · Public domain