¶1 The attorney appointed to represent Eddie James Sutton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Sutton has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Sutton’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
235 F. App'x 350
United States v. Sutton
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided August 21, 2007
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-08-21
Relies on Anders v. California
Decided 2007-08-21