Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

235 F. App'x 60

Acoolla v. Angelone

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2007

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-08-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2017

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-08-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Shaka Zulu Aeoolla appeals the district court’s order granting relief to the defendants and dismissing his claims under the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Acoolla v. Angelone, No. 7:01-cv-01008-jct, 2006 WL 2548207 (W.D.Va. Sept. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/235/fappx/60 · .json · Public domain