Wirtz v. Robb’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 49 (§ 9 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 29 U.S.C. § 521
Relies on Malloy v. Hogan · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · White v. Schwartz · Goldberg v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 299 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary of Labor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any support for the position of respondents in relation to the self-incrimination claim that may have heretofore existed has been, in our opinion, abrogated by two recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court. They are Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 , 84 S.Ct. 1489, 12 L.Ed.2d 653, and Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, 378 U.S. 52 , 84 S.Ct. 1594, 12 L.Ed.2d 678. We deem these to be not only directly applicable here but controlling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wirtz v. Robb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.