235 F. Supp. 2d 1085 - Mitchell v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Reno v. Koray · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sloan · City of Los Angeles v. Department of Transportation · United States v. Bestfoods · Martinez v. Ylst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(B) The term ‘eligible prisoner’ means a prisoner who is- (i) determined by the Bureau of Prisons to have a substance abuse problem; and (ii) willing to participate in a residential substance abuse treatment program.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.