Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 Ga. 128 - Cain v. State

Cain v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

214
cited by 214 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 211 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 214 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Nelson (1979), Satterfield v. State (1987)

3 federal appellate · 211 state decisions

106019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wenzler v. Pitchess · Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. · Mathis v. State · 130 Ga. App. 745 - Merrill v. State · 129 Ga. App. 612 - Moore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “considering motions to sever: 1. Will the number of defendants create confusion of the evidence and law applicable to each individual defendant? 2. Is there a danger that evidence admissible against one defendant will be considered against another despite the admonitory precaution of the court? 3. Are the defenses of the defendants antagonistic to each other or to each other's rights? See People v. Maestas, 517 P2d 461 (Colo. 1973).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ut the burden is on the defendant requesting the severance to do more than raise the possibility that a separate trial would give him a better chance of acquittal. [Cit.] He must make a clear showing of prejudice and a consequent denial of due process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether to grant or deny a severance should be decided on a case-by-case basis and is an issue that is left to the discretion of the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.