Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 Ga. App. 635 - Hamilton v. Walker

235 Ga. App. 635 - Hamilton v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2017

17 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 226 Ga. App. 459 - Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp. · Harvey v. Buchanan · 148 Ga. App. 254 - Banks v. Adair · 219 Ga. App. 597 - Rowlette v. Paul · 125 Ga. App. 557 - Carter v. Ide

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his Court consistently has held that the dog must have, on a prior occasion, done the same act which resulted in the injury comprising the tort action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[nullify] the precedential value of authority requiring that the animal previously caused the identical harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.