235 Ill. App. 3d 418 - People v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 173 Ill. 2d 220 - People v. Falaster (1996), 255 Ill. App. 3d 306 - People v. Koutsakis (1993)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Youngblood · 106 Ill. 2d 237 - People v. Collins · United States v. Augenblick · 145 Ill. 2d 353 - People v. Illgen · 128 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule ***: * * * *** Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.” Fed. R. Evid. 803(4).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“There is a plethora of Illinois decisions which affirm convictions notwithstanding the loss or destruction of evidence which defendants believed might have been helpful to their defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although medical personnel may testify as to statements made by a sexual assault victim to medical diagnosis or treatment, they may not identify the alleged perpetrator.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Drake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.