Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 Ind. 499 - Riggs v. State

Riggs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2017

17 state decisions

601956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stilley Plywood Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Abraham v. State · State Ex Rel. Cutsinger v. Spencer, Judge · Irwin v. State · Fluty v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Although we are not unmindful that by reason of the nature of the details there is a natural reticence for a child of such age to speak out in detail, still the delicacies of the situation should not be permitted to outweigh the fact that a man's liberty and reputable life is at stake. The consequential embarrassment is a small price, to pay in return for a showing of the witnesses' understanding of the details upon which such conclusion may be properly or improperly based. A child of 12 is not competent to give her conclusion of `sexual intercourse' without showing her understanding of details supporting such conclusion, while at the same time a more mature person with more knowledge of such matters might be qualified. Flinn v. State (1919), 188 Ind. 531 , 124 N.E. 875 ."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Courts are very hesitant to grant a writ of error coram nobis on the ground of alleged incompetency of counsel unless there appears to be a grossly aggravated case presented for consideration.” Riggs v. State (1956), 235 Ind. 499, 504 , 135 N. E. 2d 247 , 250, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.