Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 Iowa 213 - Meredith v. Cockshoot

Meredith v. Cockshoot’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1979
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1979

3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

501944195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sieck v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It should be kept in mind that the rules of law as to the sufficiency of proof in a case of this character are different in a law action than in an equitable proceeding”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.