State v. Durst’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably State v. Shehan (1987), Sutter Bros. Construction Co. v. City of Leavenworth (1985)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Van Oster v. State of Kansas · Farmers State Bank v. Cooper · State v. Rodriguez · State v. One Bally Coney Island No. 21011 Gaming Table · Unified School District No. 461 v. Dice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he essential elements of due process in an action affecting a person's life, liberty, or property are notice and an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner. State v. Durst, 235 Kan. 62, 66 , 678 P.2d 1126 (1984).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Our prior decisions have included within the scope of this definition [of gambling devices] a variety of machines and equipment. We have, however, consistently recognized a distinction between property which is illegal per se and therefore contraband, and property which is capable of innocent use but which may become contraband in a particular case because of the illegal use made of the property." State v. Durst, 235 Kan. 62, 64 , 678 P.2d 1126 (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dissmeyer v. State“`that determines whether it is possessed and used as a gambling device.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.