Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 Ky. 60 - Marsee v. Bates

Marsee v. Bates’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 1970
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1970

9 state decisions

6019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moore v. Hart · Wilder v. Cadle · Prichard v. Collins · Wells v. King · Hart v. Roth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the statute the signal may be given either by the hand and arm or by the electrical or mechanical device. Both are not required by the statute. The electrical or mechanical device is a mechanical substitute for the hand, many of which are in common use on cars. It has no reference-to the blowing of the horn.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.