Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 Md. 456 - Toomey v. Gomeringer

Toomey v. Gomeringer’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably DuBay v. Crane (1965), Sugarloaf Citizens' Ass'n v. Department of Environment (1996)

40 state decisions

90196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pressman v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE · Costello v. Sieling · Richmark Realty Co. v. Whittlif · Levy v. Seven Slade, Inc. · Pattison v. Corby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * The provisions of Rule B4 a and b with regard to the time for filing an appeal are generally similar to those of Rule B9 for the time of filing an answer. All use the word ‘shall/ as does Rule B2 e, which deals in part with the time for filing a petition which, if not joined with, must follow an order for appeal. We note that Rule B4 c requires an application for extension of time for filing an order of appeal to be made within the time allowed for filing the order of appeal. There is no counterpart to this provision in Rule BP, nor is there any to Rule B5. The latter provides that the appeal shall be dismissed for failure to file an order for appeal within the time prescribed by Rule B4, or to file a petition of appeal under Rule B2 e within the time prescribed by the Rule, ‘unless cause to the contrary be shown.’ ” [Emphasis ours.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.