235 Md. App. 1 - Chassels v. Krepps’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jacques v. First National Bank · Flaherty v. Weinberg · County Commissioners v. J. Roland Dashiell & Sons, Inc. · Ellerin v. Fairfax Savings · Bobo v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Cleaned up" is a new parenthetical intended to simplify quotations from legal sources. See Jack Metzler, Cleaning Up Quotations , J. APP. PRAC. & PROCESS (forthcoming 2018), https://perma.cc/JZR7-P85A. Use of "cleaned up" signals that the current author has sought to improve readability by removing extraneous, non-substantive clutter (such as brackets, quotation marks, ellipses, footnote signals, internal citations or made un-bracketed changes to capitalization) without altering the substance of the quotation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lopez v. State · Lamalfa v. Hearn“a legal or equitable duty which, irrespective of the moral guilt of the fraud feasor, the law declares fraudulent because of its tendency to deceive others, to violate public or private confidence, or to injure public interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“generally arises in a context of trust or confidence, such as a fiduciary duty or confidential relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.