235 Md. App. 299 - Lindsey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Dorsey v. State · State v. Albrecht · Chaney v. State · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'(1) whether the requested instruction was a correct statement of the law; (2) whether it was applicable under the facts of the case; and (3) whether it was fairly covered in the instructions actually given.' " Keller v. Serio , 437 Md. 277 , 283, 85 A.3d 283 (2014) (quoting Stabb , 423 Md. at 465 , 31 A.3d 922 ). Although the overall determination is one of abuse of discretion, "we review without deference ... whether the jury instruction was a correct statement of the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defer to any reasonable inferences a jury could have drawn in reaching its verdict, and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support those inferences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“indicat[es] that the instruction given by trial judge was a correct statement of the law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.