Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 235 MISS 336 - Tynes v. McLendon

Tynes v. McLendon’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1972
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Meridian City Lines v. Baker · Hines v. McCullers · National Fire Insurance v. Slayden · Jones v. Carter · RAWLINGS v. Royals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * This instruction , is clearly erroneous for the reason that it would allow the jury to find negligence without giving any guide as to what acts or omissions within the pleadings and proof are sufficient to constitute actionable negligence. It simply turned the jury loose to grope in the darkness without any light to guide them as to what would or would not be negligence. Such an instruction has been condemned by this Court on so many different occasions * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.