235 Mo. App. 64 - Friede v. Lytle, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1968
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pruitt v. Harker · Spiro v. St. Louis Transit Co. · Howes v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co. · Betz v. Columbia Telephone Co. · Biskup Ex Rel. Biskup v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“" * * * The court, on appeal, shall review only questions of law and may modify, reverse, remand for rehearing, or set aside the award upon any of the following grounds and no other: “(1) That the commission acted without or in excess of its powers; “(2) That the award was procured by fraud; “(3) That the facts found by the commission do not support the award; “(4) That there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to warrant the making of the award.” (Emphasis ours.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.