¶1 Concurring Opinion.
¶2 The record fairly discloses that this cause was tried on the theory that the will is ambiguous and that extrinsic evidence was. competent. Examining this evidence I find it conflicting. The testimony of Mr. Trader, if believed, clearly and unmistakably, shows that the intention of the testator was as found by Judge Cave in his opinion. Consequently,' I do not feel that we should disagree with the conclusions reached by the trial court. [Hunnell v. Zinn, 184 S. W. 1157.]