State v. Burke’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably United States v. Rambo (1996), State Of Iowa Vs. James Maximiliano Ochoa (2010)
7 federal appellate · 54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Griffin v. Wisconsin · State v. Fogarty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he probation officer must be able to supervise the probationer [or parolee], and upon his judgment and expertise, search the probationer's [or parolee's] residence or cause it to be searched.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. New · State v. Burchett“[t]his special need [of permitting a greater impingement on the rights of probationers and parolees, as stated in Griffin ] is equally applicable to the State of Montana.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Olmsted · State v. Hall“[T]he probation agency must be able to act based upon a lesser degree of certainty than the Fourth Amendment would otherwise require in order to intervene before a probationer does damage to himself or society. The agency, moreover, must be able to proceed on the basis of its entire experience with the probationer, and to assess probabilities in the light of its knowledge of his life, character and circumstances. Griffin, [ 483 U.S. at 879 ,] 107 S.Ct. at 3171 . Thus, the special needs of the probation system strongly militate toward the “reasonable grounds” standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moody
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.